Thursday, July 25, 2013

Justice Department Will Challenge States' Voting Rights Laws


http://crooksandliars.com/breaking-news/justice-department-will-challenge-st
Eric Holder official portrait.jpgThe Justice Department is preparing to take fresh legal action in a string of voting rights cases across the nation, U.S. officials said, part of a new attempt to blunt the impact of a Supreme Court ruling that the Obama administration has warned will imperil minority representation.
The decision to challenge state officials marks an aggressive effort to continue policing voting rights issues and follows a ruling by the court last month that invalidated a critical part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Justices threw out Section 5 of the landmark act, which protects minority voters by requiring certain states with a history of discrimination to be granted Justice Department or court approval before making voting law changes.
In the coming weeks, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. is expected to announce that the Justice Department is using other sections of the Voting Rights Act to bring lawsuits or take other legal action to prevent states from implementing certain laws, including requirements to present certain kinds of identification in order to vote. The department is also expected to try and force certain states to get approval, or “pre-clearance,” before they can change their election laws.
this is the reason for the attacks on Holder they knew he would come after their voter disenfranchisement so they wanted to dirty his name so those who oppose will help their propaganda machine to fight to keep progressives out of the voting booths.
"Even as Congress considers updates to the Voting Rights Act in light of the Court's ruling, we plan, in the meantime, to fully utilize the law's remaining sections to subject states to pre-clearance as necessary," Holder planned to say in a speech Thursday morning in Philadelphia
flaw in their plan thwey start the attacks early hoping to set the tone for when it hits the fan, works on some but others more informed are not hearing what they are trying to get ahead of so it comes off as indiscriminate bashing which has become their trademark.