http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/11/11/1176531/graham-obstruct-state-benghazi/
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) promised to block anyone President Obama appointed to lead the Department of State — especially current U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice — if they were at all involved with the handling of the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya. Speaking on CBS’ Face the Nation, Graham called the consulate “a death trap for months” and suggested he would prevent anyone involved in the Administration’s response to the attack from taking the top job at State:
GRAHAM: I do reserve unto myself and other members of congress the ability to say no when justified. I cannot imagine promoting anybody associated with Benghazi at this point. …SCHIEFFER: Well, I mean, would you try to lead a move to block her [Ambassador Rice] from getting the nomination if in fact she is nominated?GRAHAM: I’m not entertaining promoting anybody that I think was involved with Benghazi debacle.
still the same party no specifics just threatening hyperbole, convicting those not convicted and depriving "we the people" of representatives we may endorse. mememe all over again.
While it’s certainly true that Benghazi was a terrible tragedy, there’s simply no evidence that it was the sort of massive, disqualifying scandal that Graham says it is. Detailed, exhaustive reporting on the issue has shown that there was no “smoking gun” of a coverup nor any massive failure to respond to the attack withproportionate force.This wealth of evidence has led former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, no Democratic partisan, to say that the massive overreaction from people like Graham is overblown and that “it’s probably better to let the relevant bodies do their work.”
sticking their noes's in and judging on irresponsible self creation on evidence and is relevence. not changed anyway without Romney, makes you wonder if he had won would we still be staring at the same screen?
same crap different day.
