Fox News' Chris Wallace casted doubt on the fact that many journalists have donated to the Clinton Foundation, asking to see a list for proof while ignoring the fact that the co-chief operating officer of the parent company of his own network donated money to the Clinton Foundation.
After ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos disclosed charitable donations to the Clinton Foundation "in support of the work they're doing on global AIDS prevention and deforestation," media falsely equated donations to the Foundation with contributions to a Democratic political campaign, ignoring the fact that the Foundation's work is expressly nonpartisan, and has been supported by numerous Republicans and conservative media figures.
On the May 17 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, host Wallace expressed skepticism that "lots of journalists gave money" to the Clinton Foundation after Fox News contributor Kirsten Powers asserted the Clinton campaign "is making a point of" noting donations made by journalists, adding that he'd "like [to see] that list."
But Wallace's own network is one of several conservative media outlets that have donated to the Clinton Foundation. The News Corporation Foundation, which is headed by Rupert Murdoch and was formerly the parent company of Fox News donated between $500,001 to $1,000,000 to the foundation, and James R. Murdoch, the co-chief operating officer of Fox News' parent company 21st Century Fox and son of Rupert Murdoch, donated between $1,000,001 to $5,000,000.they just proved what is said about them they don't do the homework they jump on chances to slap Progressives with their standard "i have no proof but....." there is an arrogance that colors those who feel no need to check it out before it comes out the mouth. also something i want to point out just like the Pres. trying to give every American citizen the ability to have healtcare they can afford and quality care that they were not getting before and what do republicans do call it an abomination. remember Romney campaign and the statement about not letting facts dictate to them???
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/23/mitt-romney-_n_1836139.html
now with this latest dust up over Stephanopoulos donating to Clinton initiative disqualifying him from hosting the republican debate the same debate they control from how long to what questions are asked so what the fuss?? are they afraid he would go off their script and catch one of their now 36 wannabe's in a lie they do that all by themselves they don't need help.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/rnc-presidential-straw-poll-36-candidates-republican-party-2106-117968.html
they seem to think anything or program designed to help people here or abroad is just another abomination showing their true colors as heartless money grubbing SOB's who find to advantage or need to help those they have helped to suppress for so many decades i guess they figure it to be counterproductive to their primary goal privatization and take over of everything we need and use for life,
if foundations help those they abandoned it changes everything like the Pres.'s initiatives change what their agenda is. so bottom line finding faux scandal and beating down the candidate most likely to defeat them 2016 more denial of help and resources takes a front seat and is more important than the good this org. does for humanity another buzz word not to be used because it just doesn't jive with republican "PRINCIPLES" formerly known as "VALUES", they know what the initiative does and that my friends is what the fuss is all about.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/10/us/politics/republicans-tighten-grip-on-debates-in-2016-race.html?_r=0
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/clinton-global-initiative
