http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/09/1290818/-Jim-DeMint-grumbles-that-big-government-didn-t-free-the-slaves?detail=email
this is further proof of their stagnant mindset and why and where they want to take the country back to. the Tea people are the only ones who bring up Nazi references and old guard they can't seem to get slave out of their vocabulary and both are the only ones to use them in respect to the African American duly elected President of the United State of America, Barrack Hussein Obama.
attribution: Wikicommons
DeMented.
Former South Carolina senator Jim DeMint, who left government in order to spend more time with other people's money, has some curious notions about American slavery, the Civil War and the government. Specifically, he doesn't think the American government had much of a role in ending slavery, it was just some stuff that happened.
that whole BS elephant dung smelling compilation of his was it run pass the think tank? boy if they made him IN CHARGE AND THIS IS ALL THEY THINK ABOUT NO WONDER THEY ARE WHERE THEY ARE he forgot this blight on American history called the CIVIL WAR, trying to sugar plum it up only works if you are southern radical and think you are lord and master over another man/woman and that your ancestors were perfectly in their rights.Well the reason that the slaves were eventually freed was the Constitution, it was like the conscience of the American people. Unfortunately there were some court decisions like Dred Scott and others that defined some people as property, but the Constitution kept calling us back to ‘all men are created equal and we have inalienable rights’ in the minds of God. But a lot of the move to free the slaves came from the people, it did not come from the federal government. It came from a growing movement among the people, particularly people of faith, that this was wrong. People like [British abolitionist William Wilberforce] who persisted for years because of his faith and because of his love for people. So no liberal is going to win a debate that big government freed the slaves. In fact, it was Abraham Lincoln, the very first Republican, who took this on as a cause and a lot of it was based on a love in his heart that comes from God.
failure to mention the rose by any other name is still a tainted past that just changed it's name to Democrats,
http://www.livescience.com/34241-democratic-republican-parties-switch-platforms.html
So government didn't free the slaves, it was just the Constitution and Abraham Lincoln, neither of which is government because shut up. Also, the slaves were freed because the American people wanted to free the slaves, except for the half that didn't, shut up about that too please, and Dred Scott was terrible and defining people as property was terrible and we will go to great and gymnastic lengths to not mention an entire freaking and unbelievably bloody war premised on the supposed small-gubbermint right to keep defining those people as property or to leave and form a new country which would. Nope, it was all the Constitution and the people and long-dead British politicians, and I say unto you again will you please shut up about the rest of it.
Still, though: Could there be anything more "big government" than going to war with secessionist states to force them to remain a part of the nation, then freeing the slaves by presidential fiat? Calling that a small government act seems a hard sell indeed.
for persons that want to run the country they sure no little about it then or now but they sure know how to cheat, lie and steal and trample constitutional rights.