Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Sean Hannity warns papal infallibility doesn't apply to Marxist pope

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/12/18/sean-hannity-marxist-pope/

Article Photo
Last week Sean Hannity was just your ordinary pompous ass on Fox News. He was sneering and grand eloquent. And, yes, he wore expensive suits and featured carefully-coiffed hair.

Sean Hannity is infallible!

Today, Sean Hannity is infallible. According to Hannity, a self-proclaimed “good Catholic,” however, the Pope is probably not. Wait, did Sean Hannity just challenge the age-old Catholic Church dogma of papal infallibility? For “good Catholics,” the Pope is always right
During his Monday telecast, Sean Hannity aired a clip from fellow windbag Rush Limbaugh’s radio show. Limbaugh could not believe what Pope Francis was saying. Rush could hardly credit his right-wing ears! 
Francis had attacked “unfettered capitalism!” Francis said it was time for world leaders to fight “poverty” and “growing inequality.”
you know all the Christian things that the Bible says Jesus was all about so is he damning the Pope or Jesus?
“This is just pure Marxism coming out of the Pope,” Limbaugh moaned.
Of course, in The Land of Fox, Rush was declared right. Remember those hard-working money changers in the temple? Luckily, there was no Volcker Rule in A.D. 33. You don’t want to go around “fettering” capitalism do you? No. You don’t. You want modern-day money changers to be able to charge interest rates of 400%.
Who else was shocked by Pope Francis’s radical screed? Sean Hannity was, too.
Francis called unfettered capitalism “a new kind of tyranny.” Hannity said it was not. A liberal panelist on the show tried to explain what the Catholic leader meant. A goofy right-wing babe interrupted. Francis was so wrong! “Free market capitalism does help the poor,” she fumed. “When you lower taxes, when you create competition in the market place that’s what allows people to rise up. When you kill incentive….”
you know what really is true the ignorance promoted by Fox to underinform but can we say under inform when they are not informed enough to under inform it's the talking points of the month and they are telling faithful Catholics believe us at Fox and ignore the Pope, audacity of arrogance or by products of the party of stupidity?