Sunday, January 24, 2016

Barack Obama says U.S. has 'strongest, most durable economy in the world' during State of the Union

Mostly True

We should note up front that many of the experts we checked with considered Obama’s claim to be vague and difficult to prove.
"This is the type of braggadocio statement that is hard to interpret in a rigorous way," said Barry Bosworth, an economist at the Brookings Institution.
However, many of the same experts agreed that if you had to choose one country for the title of "strongest, most durable economy in the world," it would be the United States.
White House evidence: GDP and jobs
When we asked the White House for their evidence, a spokeswoman said the United States is the world’s largest economy at current market exchange rates.
Also, she added, the United States’ gross domestic product -- the sum of all economic activity -- is up by a cumulative 9.7 percent since the first quarter of 2008. That’s about twice as fast as the increase in other industrialized economies, according to a data collected by Haver Analytics from International Monetary Fund and World Bank figures.
The White House also pointed to strong job growth. Since 2010, the United States has added as many jobs as all the rest of the advanced economies combined, according to Haver data. (We have rated Half True a claim by Obama in his 2015 State of the Union address, that "since 2010, America has put more people back to work than Europe, Japan, and all advanced economies combined." We found that Obama was correct on the numbers but ignored persistent declines in the labor force participation rate.)
How fast will world economies grow in 2016 and 2017?
Experts told us that these two statistics -- gross domestic product and employment -- are reasonable ones to use as evidence for Obama’s claim, so we took a fresh look at the data. We interpreted Obama’s phrases -- "right now" and "the strongest, most durable economy" -- to suggest a focus on what’s happening now and into the immediate future, rather than looking at past growth rates.
We turned to projections for GDP growth over the next two years released by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, a group of economically advanced countries. The group looked at 43 countries, ranging from large, advanced economies to smaller, advanced economies to large, emerging economies.
The United States ranked almost exactly in the middle of the OECD’s list -- No. 21. Experts told us, however, that a middling ranking on this list doesn’t necessarily mean the United States’ economic outlook is weak. (The full chart is at the end of this article, ranked in descending order by projected GDP growth in 2016).
For starters, many of the countries with higher projected growth rates have significantly smaller economies, making a comparison with the United States apples-to-oranges. These countries include Ireland, Iceland, the Slovak Republic, Poland, Israel, Latvia, Luxembourg, Lithuania and Estonia.
In addition, a few countries have much higher projected growth rates, but they are generally considered emerging economies, making for a different but equally questionable type of apples-to-oranges comparison. These include the top three countries on the projected-growth list: India, China and Indonesia.
"Many developing and emerging market countries will surpass the United States in terms of GDP growth, but that's not really a fair comparison," said Jon Hoddenbagh, an assistant professor of international economics at Johns Hopkins University. "It's easier to ‘catch up’ in productivity when you are well below the technological frontier, and more difficult to grow at the technological frontier itself, which is where the United States and other advanced economies find themselves."  
Meanwhile, the recent financial wobbliness in China doesn’t exactly bode well for it being considered "durable" despite its rapid GDP growth in recent years. China’s troubles in turn have slowed growth in other emerging-market countries, especially commodity exporters like Brazil and Russia.
far too many times have we allowed the republicans to define us and the country's status and way far too much has no one stepped up and set it straight and the country get's left with the republican version.  much f this could have been avoided had Pres. or someone immediately put it right but here we are 7 years later and too many things are still in the republican definition column.  i will never understand that and Pres. needs to tell us before he leaves office i'm sure he would not want history to footnote him without explanation.
Our ruling
Obama said that "the United States of America, right now, has the strongest, most durable economy in the world."
It’s a claim that’s vague and hard to assess, but when comparing the United States to the most advanced economies in the world, one can make a credible case that the United States is in the strongest position, at least "right now." We rate the claim Mostly True.