Wednesday, October 7, 2015

House Republicans about to dump a real awkward issue on vulnerable senators

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/10/07/1428734/-House-Republicans-about-to-dump-a-real-awkward-issue-on-vulnerable-senators

Illinois Sen, Mark Kirk talks on the telephone

House Republicans are putting Senate Republicans in a difficult spot with their plan to use reconciliation to defund Planned Parenthood and repeal chunks of Obamacare. Those are the kind of politically risky votes that Republicans in the heavily gerrymandered House can embrace, but senators have to be a little more careful about. Senators facing tough races in 2016, for instance, and those who like to be seen as sane moderates.
Sen. Mark Kirk (Ill.), one of the most vulnerable Republicans in next year’s elections, twice voted against procedural motions on legislation to block the healthcare group’s funding.
Sen. Susan Collins (Maine) has spoken on the Senate floor against defunding the group, though she did back a procedural motion in August that could have led to an up-or-down vote on defunding. She said she only did so on assurances from leadership that it would lead to another measure to maintain funding for Planned Parenthood’s other healthcare services. [...]
Murkowski, Collins and Sen. Kelly Ayotte (N.H.) in September all voted against proceeding to a short-term government funding measure that would have cut off Planned Parenthood, further muddying the issue.
Republicans need 51 votes for reconciliation, which means that all four of these senators will come under intense pressure from their fellow Republicans, no doubt, but they'll also have to ask themselves "Do I want to be The One Deciding Vote on defunding Planned Parenthood?" And that's the sort of thing that will not help Kirk or Ayotte in their re-election campaigns and will deal a real blow to Collins' carefully maintained reputation as a non-extremist.
you see their is a back burner concern for what the people care about and want when it comes to re election, i've ask a few times before what good is is re electing someone who from day one only concern is re election then while in office obstruct everything Pres. tries to do for us blames the lack of results on him then wants you to vote them back in two years later, it does beg to interpret what or who exactly the party of stupid are????????

republicans like that question are you better off than 4 years ago the answer generally especially from who they ask is a resounding no but do they ever stop to think why like 7 years of republican do nothing congress's and a 2008 pledge to do nothing to make this Pres. look good.  like the devil the greatest thing they ever did was convince their base they weren't the ones screwing up their lives.