Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski clash over Fox, MSNBC

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/08/joe-scarborough-mika-brzezinski-morning-joe-95280.html?hp=r5

Co-hosts Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough clashed Wednesday morning on “Morning Joe” over whether there is a difference between Fox News and MSNBC, with Brzezinski calling Fox a “mouthpiece for the Republican Party.”

The pair were discussing Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Preibus’s fight with NBC and CNN over plans to air specials on Hillary Clinton.

“I feel like we’ve got to get Reince on the show,” Brzezinski said. “I understand the argument completely, except that the Republicans have their own network that has a president that goes and asks people to run for the party. And until Reince Priebus is demanding that Fox do some really great pieces on Democrats and documentaries, I’m not sure it is completely a perfect argument.”

“What about MSNBC?” Scarborough asked. “Every time you bring up Fox, you’ve to bring up MSNBC.

“I don’t see MSNBC going after Democratic presidential candidates and trying to hire them or trying to push them into forefront. And everything you read is that Roger Ailes gets behind Republican candidates, he hires them, he puts them on the air. It is a mouthpiece for the Republican Party,” Brzezinski said.

that truth was ignored and and he continued his rant with self serving quips about losing his job that was as disingenuous as i have heard the blowhard.

Scarborough, who had been defending CNN for doing a documentary but bashing NBC Entertainment for pursuing a "bio pic," grew animated, saying he couldn't hold back any longer.

"I'm sorry I can't be quiet here. I can't be quiet. What do you think MSNBC is at night?" Scarborough said. "It is exactly the same."

Brzezinski said she didn't think so.

Scarborough responded, "Of course you don't think so because you are a Democrat."

and with that quip he exposes himself he just confirmed her point of view while rebuking his own, it also shows no ideas and leadership lead to this over and over. arguing without a cause.  notice the inference he put on "DEMOCRAT"?