The common theme of much of the gun enthusiast community is that they want unfettered access to any and all guns to, 1) protect their family/home; 2) fight tyranny [so far extremely undefined], and 3) defend against marauding hordes in a time of social unrest.
This brings us to the events of last two weeks in Colorado and Texas. On March 20, the Executive Director of Colorado Prisons, Tom Clements, was gunned down at his front door. It would be expected, considering his job, that he was armed, or at least had a firearm in his home.Days later the suspect shot a Deputy Sheriff in Texas minutes before he was fatally injured during a car chase. The gun in his possession was traced back to the gun that killed Colorado prison chief Clements. That gun, a Smith & Wesson 9mm semi-automatic, had been purchased through a strawman buyer two weeks before Clements was killed. The suspect was a member of the Aryan Brotherhood of Texas.On January 31, in Kaufman, Texas, Assistant District Attorney Mark E. Hasse, 57, was gunned down in the employee parking lot of the Kaufman County Courthouse by two men wearing tactical vests. He was working on a major case against the Aryan Brotherhood of Texas. He was armed and expecting trouble.On March 30, Kaufman District Attorney Mike McLelland and his wife were gunned down in their home by assassins with an AR-15 rifle. The 20+ shots killed the District Attorney who had 23 years of military training, weapons in his home and, after his ADA was killed less than two months earlier, was expecting trouble.Three days later, April 2, the Federal prosecutor in Dallas, who had been working on the Aryan Brotherhood of Texas case, walked away from the job for “security” reasons. This prosecutor had available the blanket of security of the U.S. Marshal’s service to protect him. He did not feel safe.
not to diminish the deaths of these people, but it does put the exception to the rule, if trained i know it's coming guy can't save themselves or trust the US Marshalls to speaks volumes to any ones safety under authorial protection
with all the firepower avaiable soon at your local grocer or picture developing booths in the middle of the mall parking lot, wow think of that scenario with one of these gracies armed at Xmas. bottom line more guns just means more deaths that it period
The focus at this time is on the Aryan Brotherhood of Texas but consideration is still being given to other possible groups.And that brings us back to marauding hordes. If anything defines civil unrest by an armed group, these last few months do; unrest perpetrated by a highly armed criminal enterprise that apparently is fearless to the repercussions of killing cops and district attorneys. When we realistically look at defending against a marauding horde and home invasion, it seems there is a perception that the "good guy with the gun" will, as he does in the movies, stop the "bad guy with a gun." In three very clear instances, the victims did not stand a chance. They were armed, prepared and, by all indications, trained to protect themselves and their family. All for naught.
they are arming those who now by benefit of that arming have become scarier then the New Black Panthers, how are not engaged in anything like this, so now we have a new bogeyman who looks nothing like the old ones right next door, good luck with that free shotgun or 100 guns and thousand rounds which only do you any good if you can get to them before it hits the fan.
is your freedom to own a gun or guns worth the paranoia of looking over your shoulder when it can come right under your nose from those you fear less or maybe not at all, if you don't instigate probably won't initiate make sense?
