Friday, March 1, 2013

Liberals See A Trap After The Sequester


http://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/liberals-see-a-trap-after-the-sequester
While lawmakers in Washington trade shots over the $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts, due to take effect Friday, there's a growing consensus among liberals across the country that the real threat to the social safety net isn't this fight, but the next one.
As originally designed in 2011, the deficit-reduction sequester splits cuts between defense and domestic spending, and explicitly exempted programs like social security and Medicaid. But no one in Washington believes the sequester cuts will be permanent, and liberals worry the deal Congress eventually reaches to replace it will slash funding to those programs — as Republicans and some Democrats have advocated.
"There's a broader concern about the fact that entitlements may get ensnared when we go to an alternative fix, [that] they won't escape," Rep. Jerry Nadler, a progressive Democrat from New York, told BuzzFeed. "I have heard that concern."
they do well to be concerned there is no honor when you deal with thieves you can bet your last $10,000 dollars that whatever unscrupulous plan they have in mind will not be good for "we the people".
"Not only do we have the sequester, but we have to be thinking about the deal that replaces it as well," said Melissa Boteach, a director at the Center for American Progress. "Republicans have already begin to push hard for benefit cuts."
Although House Democrats signed a letter this month stating their opposition to entitlement cuts, President Barack Obama has signaled a willingness to bring such spending reductions to the table as part of a grand bargain with Republicans. 
let's get real we do need to revamp the entitlement program, with republicans denying revenue and stalling the economy and population growing it's a must do, just not the way the republicans want to by leaving status quo in the 1%  and beat down further the middleclass on down. 2014?