Saturday, August 4, 2012

Mitt Romney: Michele Bachmann's Muslim Brotherhood Claims Are 'Not Part Of My Campaign'



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/03/mitt-romney-michele-bachmann-muslim-brotherhood_n_1738585.html


Mitt Romney declined to speak out against Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) and four other House Republicans on Friday for seeking to investigate whether Huma Abedin, a top aide to Hillary Clinton, has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
Following a campaign event in Reno, Nev., a reporter asked the presumptive Republican presidential nominee for his reaction to both Bachmann's allegations against Abedin and a controversy surrounding Chick-Fil-A and gay marriage.
“I’m not going to tell other people what things to talk about," Romney responded. "Those are not things that are part of my campaign.” 
cowardly wannabe, to let him tell it he is like sgt. Shultz on "Hogan's Hero's" "he knows nothing" about his taxes or how he feels about the bigotted racially charged things his cohorts say, he'll gladly find out if he payed under 13.9% in taxes, whenever maybe never.
he will not outright call someone of his clan out on radical behavior he claims "not words i would use"  to now "not part of his campaign", but in silence is he not dog whistling to the base, "not the words i would use, but my words would still mean the same thing".
why did he take so long to rebuke the crazinest, was he waiting on someone to tell him what he felt? or was it becoming a heated issue sure to put a dark mark on his otherwise totally opaque record of service to "we the people" or more accurately himself?