Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney continued to push the claim that his jobs plan will create 12 million jobs during Tuesday's presidential debate, despite recent controversy surrounding the studies on which that claim is based."We have not made the progress, we need to make to put people back to work," Romney said, according to a transcript provided by the Washington Post. "That’s why I put out a five-point plan that gets America 12 million new jobs in four years and rising take-home pay."
maybe we have not made faster progress because the right has vowed and implemented the do nothing plan to when by default or by the electorate blindness.
In some ways, it's a safe bet, with a recent analysispredicting that exact number of jobs will be created by 2016, regardless of who becomes president, a point noted by the Washington Post's Glenn Kessler.
where is the evidence Romney created jobs? all the reporting lately is how he outsourced and created jobs for competitive countries, where's his loyalty sleeping?
But when Kessler pushed the Romney campaign for the exact numbers and studies on which the jobs claim is based, they handed him "totally different studies ... with completely different timelines" than what is in the white paper that became the basis of Romney's plan. One study, for example, had a 10-year plan, and another had little to do with Romney's policy ideas.
"They're just faking it," Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman wrote in a New York Times blog post in response to the article
the surrogares are saying the people have seen Romney as a man with a plan, stop the BS his party has specified nothing but generalizations they told you "we'll tell you after the election", they told you jobs in 2010, only jobs you've gotten were under this admin with no assist from the right. common sense call?
just like that big bunch of blank pages Beohner held up in congress declaring "this is or bill", waiting to see the push back on the Pres. bill for jobs and recovery aside from "it's glossy".
But when Kessler pushed the Romney campaign for the exact numbers and studies on which the jobs claim is based, they handed him "totally different studies ... with completely different timelines" than what is in the white paper that became the basis of Romney's plan. One study, for example, had a 10-year plan, and another had little to do with Romney's policy ideas."They're just faking it," Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman wrote in a New York Times blog post in response to the article
just like that big bunch of blank pages Beohner held up in congress declaring "this is or bill", waiting to see the push back on the Pres. new bill for jobs and recovery aside from "it's glossy". Pres is not holding you back they are and will continue to if elected.
