http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2014/02/nye-ken-ham-climate-change
When Bill Nye the Science Guy took the stage Tuesday night at the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Ky., his task was to refute the idea that Biblical creationism is a scientifically valid idea—one that should be taught in schools.But as we've seen again and again, science denial is rarely limited in scope. So perhaps it shouldn't be surprising that Nye's opponent, museum head Ken Ham, doesn't just reject evolution; he's also spreading some rather unscientific ideas about global warming. Appearing on CNN after the debate,Ham informed viewers that "there's been climate change ever since the flood of Noah's day." Ham added that while the climate had warmed "a bit in the past," it's now "cooling again." (Not true.) You can watch Ham and Nye debate climate science in the clip above.
they can roll out as many people as they have misinformation i still think they are denying it because if not they would have no argument against regulation in fact that would support the need for them.
they are not 4 letter words they are prevent defense use it or lose it. i don't want a bunch of guys who are beholding to big business and their shortcuts deciding what can go buck wild and what doesn't, so far the only things they deem what doesn't, health care, food stamps, jobs, taxes and what they do want the lame voucher plan they are trying to pull out and on us.
This has been something of a theme for Ham, who says in a series of online videos that this supposed "cooling trend" is "no surprise to creation scientists." According to Ham: "Western governments have invested so much in the carbon dioxide theory that they probably won’t change their minds any time soon. But scripture tells us what really happened: We live on a young Earth that has undergone radical climate changes from the global flood."
we create a times more problems for ourselves when we allow someone to give their interpretation of the Bible, especially when it is in favor of polluting the earth and it's inhabitants, think about it they don't know they use evidence that can be interpreted in many ways depending on how much of a zealot you are. the other has facts also but i think those who don't believe it's possible will look pretty stupid turning purple and dying from nothing. recognize.
