this IMO is a insulting desperate attempt to garner the lady vote. why has there been no discussion about that since the Palin fiasco?
"Senator John McCain tried it when he named Sarah Palin as his running mate. But Republicans I've spoken with have said the 2008 Palin experience makes picking a woman this time around a non-starter".
this is an afront to women and their ability to probably do a much better job then the inept "i'm in it for the perks" crew that have brought us to this point of 2nd class nation and 3rd class citizens.
from what i've heard from the Romney camp his wife would be another Nancy Reagan, which is ok but why not run as a couple if he continually say's "i wish my wife was here,duh". then we would feel really safe if that phone rings at 3am. if it were not for the right overreaching and disrepect for women do you really believe they would even suggest a woman VP for their newly anointed? kinda hard to get a woman to go along with an agenda that totally puts her rights in the toilet. then again only 3 or 4 have expressed any opposition to their disregard of all things female.
"There are two impressive and smart governors from South Carolina and New Mexico, Nikki Haley and Susana Martinez. Martinez could also help Romney with the Hispanic vote"
these kind of statements IMO only insult the electorate now we are to believe that after all hate disrepect and vitriol toward so called minority's that this would magically erase all the prejudice and malice and they will flock to the polls to vote for Romney? don't think so suggest that there is no ability to think and that is the epitome of disrespect.
