Friday, December 5, 2014

Republican talk of blocking the State of the Union address keeps building


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/03/1349038/-Republican-talk-of-blocking-the-State-of-the-Union-address-keeps-building?detail=email

Vice President Joe Biden applauds and Speaker of the House John Boehner looks on as President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union speech on Capitol Hill in Washington, January 28, 2014. REUTERS/Larry Downing (UNITED STATES  - Tags: POLITICS)   -

Republicans, ever on the lookout for ways to express how very outraged they are at President Obama for daring to do something about immigration reform after they refused, hit upon the idea of not inviting the president to deliver the State of the Union address to Congress. The idea seemed crazy when it was first mentioned—probably because it's crazy—but it seems to be gaining steam:
Late Tuesday, Rep. Paul C. Broun (R-Ga.) called for Boehner to not invite Obama to deliver the State of the Union address next year. [...]
On the State of the Union, [Rep. Tim Huelskamp] added: “In the spirit of George Washington, he could send it to us in writing. It’d save some time.”

this is more of the last 6 years the republican sour grape machine seeks to embarrass and belittle the Pres. who just keeps on beating them regardless of all the skulduggery they engage in note, the only ones they are really hurting are "we the people" and too many of us are assisting them in their agenda those who vote for their own deprivation and those that stay home if you thought you were sending a message this is your return to sender, had you not the out look might be brighter.

Steve Benen points to some other Republicans pushing the idea, including Heritage Action's communications director saying "we'll hear a lot" about the idea. Coming from Heritage Action, that probably translates into an indirect order to congressional extremists: Hey, guys, make sure we hear a lot about this, mmkay?

Benen notes the history of the State of the Union: It's true that presidents used to deliver written reports, but traditions change and by now the in-person address to Congress is firmly ensconced. Not only that, but:
In 1999, a Republican Congress welcomed President Clinton to deliver a SOTU even after he’d literally been impeached, despite the fact that the GOP-led Senate was still weighing whether to remove the sitting president from office.
another example of the double standard republicans are using when it comes to this Pres., also a written SOTU excludes the American people from knowing what is happening remember they have been trying to tie the transparency thing to Pres. when everything they do is done undercover like who is buying their support in gov't.  this too hurts you and me keeps us out of the loop of public knowledge they aren't hurting Pres. he would be delivering the address and if they do this also gives him the ammo that they want to prevent another status quo giving them the ability to spin and mislead with misinformation for 2016 you know like everything else that has parted one or all of their lips. recognize pay attention to the history that was created so you won't repeat it in 2016, WAKE UP EVERYBODY!


'Sure, Nazis were genocidal mass-murderers, but just bear with me …'


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/03/1349120/--Sure-Nazis-were-genocidal-mass-murderers-but-just-bear-with-me?detail=email#

Dr. Ben Carson speaking at the 2014 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland.

and now from the republican second token "WANNABE"

This is so not a headline any presidential candidate should be going for: "Ben Carson stands by comparison of U.S. to Nazi Germany."
And when you're quoted saying this:
"You are just focusing on the words 'Nazi Germany' and completely missing the point of what is being said," he added.
Well, the game is pretty much over. But by all means, Dr. Carson, stick around. You're way too much fun to be knocking yourself out of the running so early.
now this guy is a neurosurgeon, which begs to question who did he pay off or who went to school for him, how can you be smart enough to operate on the human brain and dumb enough to join a party that really would rather you not be there and say some of the most anti Black inane statements about all the things they have at one time or another accused Pres. of keep in mind they are the ones the only ones to make references to nazi, slaves, plantations sweeping the dirt on the Pres.'s shoes does not any longer work when the hate rhetoric is coming out of their mouth than you accuse listeners that they are focusing on your words, another contender for Michelle Bachmann's position.

"HOUSE N..... #2"

Tea party blows off Bachmann's rally call. She ends up with a press conference.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/03/1349091/-Tea-party-blows-off-Bachmann-s-rally-call-She-ends-up-with-a-press-conference?detail=email

U.S. Rep Michele Bachmann (R-MN) waits her turn to speak at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco, California October 20, 2011. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith  (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS)

The scene: It's November 20 and President Barack Obama has just outlined his plan to defer deportation for millions of undocumented immigrants. Rep. Michele Bachmann goes on Fox News:
"I'm calling on your viewers to come to DC on Wednesday, December 3, at high noon on the west steps of the Capitol," she proclaimed. "We need to have a rally, and we need to go visit our senators and visit our congressman, because nothing frightens a congressman like the whites of his constituents' eyes. ... We need the viewers to come and help us."
High noon on December 3 has come and gone. And after the Tea Party Patriots surveyed their members on whether to make Bachmann's rally cry a priority:
... her "high noon" rally was downgraded to ... a press conference. So on Wednesday, Bachmann appeared on the Capitol steps—joined by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) and Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa)—and spoke to a passel of cameras and about 40 protesters.
wow she's too crazy for tea people now that is real crazy personified.  i believe she really thought she was relevant i wonder will she get elected again ever or will she take this as a WAKE UP CALL and stay out of sane areas she seems to know nothing about.  remember "he founding fathers fought tirelessly until slavery was no more" or,

Repeal Obamacare Before It Literally KILLS Children, KILLS Women, Senior Citizens".



but she may not be leading the pack


Wednesday, December 3, 2014

6 Solutions Emerge After Young Ferguson Activists Meet With Obama, Biden & Eric Holder


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/01/1348725/-Young-Ferguson-Activists-Meet-With-Obama-Six-Fine-Solutions-Emerge?detail=email


Monday, a group of young Black and Latino activists from around the country met with President Obama, Vice President Biden, and Attorney General Eric Holder. They met, at the president's request, to discuss the need for change:
 “The president requested this meeting because this is a movement that cannot be ignored,” said Ashley Yates, a co-founder of the St. Louis-based organization, Millennial Activists United. “We have two sets of laws in America – one for young Black and Brown people, and one for the police. We are sick and tired of our lives not mattering, and our organized movement will not relent until we see justice.”
The young leaders conveyed the experience of a traumatized community in Ferguson, where police have terrorized peaceful protesters with pointed guns, rubber bullets, chemical agents, bean bags and menacing threats. They further discussed the routine harassment and violence that many police departments inflict on countless communities of color across America, and their demands for the federal government to hold police departments that use excessive force accountable.
Most of us around the nation know what the problems are. What we want, what we need, are solutions.
Among other avenues for change, the group’s demands include:
*The federal government using its power to prosecute police officers that kill or abuse people.
*Removing local district attorneys from the job of holding police accountable, and instead having independent prosecutors at the local level charged with prosecuting officers.
*The establishment of community review boards that can make recommendations for police misconduct, instead of allowing police departments to police themselves.
*Defunding local police departments that use excessive force or racially profile.
*Instead of having the Department of Justice (DOJ) wholesale giving more than $250 million to local police departments annually, DOJ should only fund departments that agree to adopt DOJ best practices for training and meaningful community input.
The demilitarization of local police departments.
*Investing in programs that provide alternatives to incarceration, such as community-led restorative justice programs and community groups that educate people about their rights.
The suggested solutions are excellent, right? Who could argue with any of them? Bets are FOX 'News' and 'hate media' will find a way to twist and turn them. This is where Americans need to take a stand along with these activists and demand change. Here are six ways to voice your thoughts to the President/White House.
i saw one of those teens i was very impressed, i think i'll reserve my comment till we hear what let's say the opposition has to say.  one thing he said that stuck with me was i paraphrased, " i really wish i had thought of it that way just goes to show you can learn from anyone regardless to their race, creed or color it only takes discipline to listen but it takes tolerance to hear.

"body cameras and training are not going to solve the problem when it's in their heads they lived it they were raised with that bias, training and cameras will not take that out of their head"






Florida Republican official: 'Use fire hoses to knock thugs over. Probably need a shower anyway.'


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/01/1348647/-Florida-Republican-official-Use-fire-hoses-to-knock-thugs-over-Probably-need-a-shower-anyway?detail=email

Screen capture from Kim Crenier's Twitter feed.

Screen capture from Kim Crenier's Twitter feed. Florida's Duval County GOP Secretary Kim Crenier is feeling the heat after her inflammatory Twitter feed has gotten more attention than she probably ever imagined. After the decision not to indict Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, she went on quite a rant, including a suggestion that police turn fire hoses on protestors. Her Twitter feed has disappeared, but not before her offensive words were captured:
A suggestion for Ferguson- fire hoses. Grt big fire hoses, serious water pressure. Knock those thugs over. They probly need a shower anyway.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites
Kim A. Crenier @Earlgrey1 · 17h 17 hours ago
Ferguson - as long as this mob behavior is tolerated, encouraged and celebrated, it will continue.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites
Kim A. Crenier @Earlgrey1 · 17h 17 hours ago
President Race-Baiter is talking. His lips are moving. This means he is lying. He is obviously not happy with the verdict. Too bad so sad.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites
Kim A. Crenier @Earlgrey1 · 17h 17 hours ago
Our race-baiting, America hating president will speak at 10. Changing the channel now.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites
Kim A. Crenier @Earlgrey1 · 17h 17 hours ago
Ferguson - reporters trying their best to spin and play the race card.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites
Kim A. Crenier @Earlgrey1 · 18h 18 hours ago
Ferguson, MO - no true bill! May God bless and protect Officer Darren Wilson and his family.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 favorites
Kim A. Crenier @Earlgrey1 · 18h 18 hours ago
she really needs to ask God to forgive her racially bigoted ways bet she's one of the take "OUR" COUNTRY BACK CROWD BUT JUST BY VIRTUE OF HER RANTS COUNTRY IS RIGHT WHERE THEY LAST SAW IT and just as ripe as ever she also needs to reconsider who needs to be hosed down, oh by the way you're not suppose to use the Lords name in vain which brings to question her real religious convictions.  and what does she getfor showing off her right wing racist bona fides?

Florida residents are now calling for Crenier to be removed: "That's insensitive, it's racist and we're asking the executive committee for the Republican party for the state of Florida or the national executive committee to relieve Mrs. Crenier of duty," said Gundy. "To me the comment represents the disrespect for the African American Community and all communities," said Wells Todd of the Jacksonville Progressive Coalition.
now she has to wear that scarlet letter "R" and the world knows keep an eye out to see if there is a right wing reward for her eforts.

Cartoon: The color of justice


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/27/1347738/-Cartoon-The-color-of-justice?detail=email
there is not 24 colors in that box and only one that thr republicans think is relevant, they know the dire need for them to try and confuse the Hispanic vote and yet they are still showing them they don't want them here, gets pretty obvious when they talk of getting even with the Pres. and killing funding to homeland security, aren't they the ones who were just saying the Ebola and Mexicans will bring it across that same border t
that would no longer be protected just to "GET BACK AT PRES."?

they really are the party of stupid of all Americans that would be still protected it's the Pres. so they are not getting back at him they are using that to screw you. recognize

Joe Scarborough has a Lecture for Black America


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/01/1348631/-Joe-Scarborough-has-a-Lecture-for-Black-America?detail=email
Apparently Black people just don't know what's good for them.  They don't know how to pick their own heroes according to Joe Scarborough, because he says that "Michael Brown is a Thug... who knocked over a Liquor Store...and doesn't deserve to be the face of Black Oppression in America"
"The cops have every reason to be pissed off this morning," Scarborough said. He argued that the five players on the St. Louis Rams who raised their arms in solidarity with Ferguson on Sunday based their gesture on "lies" that contradicted findings of a grand jury investigation.
There are a lot of things to respond to in this, but I'm just going to address how many facts Joe gets grossly wrong. He buys into the Darren Wilson narrative hook line and sinker, claiming that that Dorian Johnson's story - that Wilson was the aggressor, that he grabbed Brown by the throat, that he shot at him as he ran away and then functionally executed him as he attempted to surrender, is the only sane, rational, reasonable conclusion.
In the end though, he perpetuates the sin he so clearly claims to abhor.  The deadly dangerous arrogance of certainty.
Before I get into the meat of this one other thing that Joe gets wrong is the claim 12 year-old Tamir Rice who was shot dead by police in Cleveland had a real gun, not a toy.  It was a Toy, a BB Gun, and the Officers refused to give him first aid or CPR.
So when he goes on and on about "Lies" - he just told a Whopper right there.
Apparently what set Joe off was five players of the St. Louis Rams holding their hands up in solidarity with the Michael Brown protests, and the police union who demanded that these player be punished.  The NFL has declined to do so, meanwhile the Ex-Cop who demanded the punishment turns out to have a history of lying to protect crooked cops.
Roorda, a Democrat who most recently served in the Missouri House of Representatives before running for a seat in the state Senate and losing, was fired from the Arnold, Missouri police department in 2001 for misconduct after having been previously warned in another case where he was found to have lied in a police report.
According to court documents, in 1997 Roorda was reprimanded for attempting “…to try to ‘cover’ for another police officer by filing a report that contained false statements as to what happened during a suspect’s apprehension and arrest. As a result of this false report, all charges against the defendant involved were dropped.” The court notes that Roorda was informed, “If it is ever determined again that you have lied in a police report, you will receive a more severe punishment, up to and including termination.”
not sure what being  Democrat had to do with his record, was that some kind of shallow inference? he was very obnoxious and nonchalantly arrogant in what he was saying was true just like O'Reilly when sharing their advanced knowledge of the Black experience and all the do's and don'ts and why's and because's. that only the right wing base actually buys, guess those around the table coward and did not challenge him maybe fearing not getting a call back, after all he is the HMDIC.
So that's the perfect person for Joe to hitch his wagon too.
But something truly odd seems to have happened here, somehow a Grand Jury which is supposed only make determination if probable cause exists has now become the Determiner of FACTS in this case.   That simply because they choose not to vote for indictment, everything that was presented in Darren Wilson's favor has been deemed and blessed as true and everyone else who disagrees is a liar who needs to be punished with perjury.
how long has he been hiding his real feelings, law is not  deserved by those who are not White but are dead by the hand of a White officer who everyone loves so much they risk their jobs to stack the court and direct the jury toward a no way the cop is wrong decision never any hint of prosecution which is their job or was it?  we will never enter the realm of reconciliation because one side denies the separation because of race and that their actions are perpetrated on that dynamic.

The audio recording of the Michael Brown shooting proves Darren Wilson's story is false

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/01/1348720/-The-audio-recording-of-the-Michael-Brown-shooting-proves-Darren-Wilson-s-story-is-false?detail=email#

Let's look at Darren Wilson's account of that final encounter. On the day of the shooting, Wilson gave a statement about what happened; the statement can be found in this document. Wilson later gave a statement to the grand jury. Certain details differed between the two statements, but the broad strokes of what he described were the same. Because the initial statement was given when the event was fresh in Wilson's memory, it should be more reliable.
According to Wilson, after Brown began to "charge" toward him in the street,
P.O. Darren Wilson continued to give Brown commands to stop; however, Brown ignored them. Once Brown got within approximately 15 feet of him, P.O. Darren Wilson indicated he discharged five rounds to stop the threat. According to P.O. Darren Wilson, this did not slow Brown down and he continued to advance. P.O. Darren Wilson discharged two additional rounds; however, Brown continued to advance.
P.O. Darren Wilson stated Brown then leaned forward and appeared as if he (Brown) was attempting to "tackle" him. P.O. Darren Wilson then discharged one additional round to stop the threat. Brown then fell to the ground, ending the threat.
this guy does not need any help from me, but i think he should turn his info over to DOJ and let them confirm the statistics.  you have to admit that on the surface it sounds plausible to those with an open mind.  still can't get that 148 ft distance from the car and if already wounded it would be reasonable that he would stumble forward, cop should have known difference in a death stumble and a charging which he said was done with his hands up, oop's.

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

KNOW YOUR ENEMY/ IT'S ABOUT WHITE RAGE

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/30/1348377/--It-s-about-white-rage?detail=email
ever noticed that the people of color who have suffered under this nation's powers that be are not the ones kicking and screaming and discriminating and suing and stripping us of our right to vote or waging a war against women and the poor they really want this kind of country their actions confirm that


Article Photo


SORRY ABOUT DOUBLE POST  ALL MY INFIRMITIES MUST HAVE KICKED IN +0)

Those are the final words of a powerful Washington Post op ed by Carol Anderson, Associate Professor of African American studies and history at Emory University, among other things.
The full title of the piece, which I strongly urge you to read, is Ferguson isn't about black rage against cops. It's white rage against progress.
She places Ferguson in as deep a historical context as I have yet seen, perhaps appropriate for the her subject matter as a college professor, going back to White rejection of the intent of the 13thj, 14th and 15th Amendments. She reminds us of the institution of Black Codes after the withdrawal of the Union Army from the South as a result of the deal that made Hayes President of the US even though Tilden had clearly won the popular vote and may have by an honest count won the electoral vote as well (shades of 2000).
She also tells us about United States v. Cruikshank, a case with which I admit despite teaching government and history I was not familiar, which limited the application of the Bill of Rights against the states and argued that the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the 14th Amendment applied only to actions by state governments, and thus private citizens could not be prosecuted for violating the rights of freedman - this in the aftermath of a riot against Republican Freedman by white Democrats during an election, in an attempt to keep them from voting.
As a side note, Justice Scalia and others who made the atrocious Heller ruling, this opinion ruled Justice Scalia and others who made the atrocious Heller ruling, this opinion ruled "The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second Amendments means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress,and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government. " Here I might note that this meant the Freed Slaves did not necessarily have a right to bear arms if a state wanted to restrict it.
And for context I remind people that the institution of gun control in California was in response to Black Panthers showing up at the state legislature carrying. Blacks can be killed by white police with impunity if the cop has even a hint of feeling threatened even if no weapon is evident (no doubt if a weapon is) but White militia types can aim at Federal law enforcement at the Bundy ranch and not be charged, and now we have the Oathkeepers (white) "patrolling" around Ferguson - will they shoot Blacks with the same kind of impunity we have seen over the years?
THESE ARE MY COMMENTS BELOW
i too pointed out the inconsistency with that instance and Ferguson as low as not protesting KKK's threats to kill protesters. there are distinct differences in how law applies and is adjudicated when it comes to race and what is never acknowledged when it's White on Black police action if not for cameras we would probably not know about most killings that would be labled missing or blamed on another of color.
i heard one of the youth activist from Ferguson today who nailed it he said paraphrased, "body cameras and training are not going to solve the problem when it's in their heads they lived it they were raised with that bias, training and cameras will not take that out of their head" i give hi a big "TOUCHE'"and an even greater factor sense of power and a God complex

Cartoon: Maybe let’s stop killing black kids?


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/26/1347678/-Cartoon-Maybe-let-s-stop-killing-black-kids?detail=email
i find truths much easier to understand when it's presented in a way that does not anger at the first two words being those of the buzz kind they seem to have to power to stop some in their tracks they never get pass those that buzz before they create an opinion often not having anything to do with the article and everything to do with them and their perceptions.

"It's about white rage."


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/30/1348377/--It-s-about-white-rage?detail=email
Those are the final words of a powerful Washington Post op ed by Carol Anderson, Associate Professor of African American studies and history at Emory University, among other things.
The full title of the piece, which I strongly urge you to read, is Ferguson isn’t about black rage against cops. It’s white rage against progress.
She places Ferguson in as deep a historical context as I have yet seen, perhaps appropriate for the her subject matter as a college professor, going back to White rejection of the intent of the 13thj, 14th and 15th Amendments.   She reminds us of the institution of Black Codes after the withdrawal of the Union Army from the South as a result of the deal that made Hayes President of the US even though Tilden had clearly won the popular vote and may have by an honest count won the electoral vote as well (shades of 2000).
She also tells us about United States v. Cruikshank, a case with which I admit despite teaching government and history I was not familiar, which limited the application of the Bill of Rights against the states and argued that the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the 14th Amendment applied only to actions by state governments, and thus private citizens could not be prosecuted for violating the rights of freedman - this in the aftermath of a riot against Republican Freedman by white Democrats during an election, in an attempt to keep them from voting.
As a side note, Justice Scalia and others who made the atrocious Heller ruling, this opinion ruled "The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second Amendments means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress,and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government. "  Here I might note that this meant the Freed Slaves did not necessarily have a right to bear arms if a state wanted to restrict it.  
And for context I remind people that the institution of gun control in California was in response to Black Panthers showing up at the state legislature carrying.  Blacks can be killed by white police with impunity if the cop has even a hint of feeling threatened even if no weapon is evident (no doubt if a weapon is) but White militia types can aim at Federal law enforcement at the Bundy ranch and not be charged, and now we have the Oathkeepers (white) "patrolling" around Ferguson - will they shoot Blacks with the same kind of impunity we have seen over the years?

i too pointed out the inconsistency with that instance and Ferguson as low as not protesting KKK's threats to kill protesters. there are distinct differences in how law applies and is adjudicated when it comes to race and what is never acknowledged when it's White on Black police action if not for cameras we would probably not know about most killings that would be labled missing or blamed on another of color.  

i heard one of the youth activist from Ferguson today who nailed it he said paraphrased, "body cameras and training are not going to solve the problem when it's in their heads they lived it they were raised with that bias, training and cameras will not take that out of their head" i give hi a big "TOUCHE'"
and an even greater factor sense of power and a God complex

He Reached For My Gun cartoon


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/26/1347740/-He-Reached-For-My-Gun-cartoon?detail=email

as absurd as this cartoon is it's not as ridiculous as the story of Michael Brown coming over leaning into an armed cops car reaching for a gun that from his perspective would have bee on opposite side if Wilson were right handed and upside down and backwards bur Wilson also said he pulled his gun while being allegedly pummeled check out tis link for a more in dept description of the event inside the car.  was this part of the binders of evidence handed to the GJ?

Why exactly did the police lie for 108 days about how far Mike Brown ran from Darren Wilson?

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/26/1347499/-Why-exactly-did-the-police-lie-for-108-days-about-how-far-Mike-Brown-ran-from-Darren-Wilson?detail=email#



The day after Mike Brown was killed, the police began stating that he died just 35 feet from Officer Darren Wilson's SUV. For the first month, in my own reporting on the case, I parroted this distance as fact—not really thinking that the police would be bold enough to publicly lie about such an essential and verifiable fact of the case.
Then, this past September, a St. Louis resident who was familiar with the crime scene wrote me privately to tell me that he had studied the distance and it appeared to him that Brown was at least 100 feet away from the SUV—and maybe much farther. For three weeks, a team of volunteers and I studied every photo publicly available from the Aug.d 9 crime scene, sent someone to Canfield Drive to measure the distance between where we believed Darren Wilson's SUV was to where we believed Brown died, studied four different mapping softwares to help measure the distance, and concluded that the distance was, in fact, at a minimum, 100 feet. At the time, we wanted to go live with the possibility that Brown ran 150 feet away, but felt that we could publicly state 100 feet as an indisputable fact.
On Sept. 18, I went public with our evidence that Brown fled at least 100 feet from Wilson's SUV.
For the following two weeks, I asked the St. Louis County Police Department to comment on the enormous difference between what it had been saying publicly and what our research found. At least four other members of the press also asked them, on my behalf, and the police refused to comment on it. In the meantime, hundreds and hundreds of stories around the world, continued to advance the 35-foot distance as fact.
Unsure if Wilson's testimony before the grand jury was going to reflect the tale that was being told about Brown charging at the officer before he was shot and killed, it dawned on me that for that to be true, he would've had to have run not 154 feet away, but more in the range of 160-180 feet—making the lie of 35 feet that much more egregious.
Finally, when the grand jury decision was delivered, and prosecutor Bob McCulloch gave his remarks before the documents were released, he confirmed that Brown had died 153 feet away from the SUV.
there are those who will never except out loud the discrepancies in the police "EVIDENCE" and eye witness and forensic evidence are miles apart and done by police set on exonerating one of their own, the influence on the GJ was not a protocol of a prosecutor one who was dedicated to doing their job as described, simply because in their minds he was a Black thug that did not deserve to live making the homicidal cop their hero.   justice was not served in Ferguson, wonder if the reverse had happened Black cop killing a White unarmed kid who allegedly robbed a store and was walking down the middle of the street, would they be so gung ho in getting him/her off?
http://educationportal.com/articles/Prosecuting_Attorney_Job_Description_Duties_and_Requirements.html

Monday, December 1, 2014

Police Group Demands Punishment for Players Over 'Hands Up' Gesture


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/police-group-demands-punishment-for-players-over-hands-up-gesture

Zlegronjlcrrscnea8mu

A Rams spokesman said Sunday the team was not aware the gesture had been planned before the game against Oakland.
Wide receivers Tavon Austin and Kenny Britt came out together first, with the move obscured by a smoke machine in the upper reaches of the Edward Jones Dome. Stedman Bailey, Jared Cook and Chris Givens — all of whom are black — then came out and stood together with arms raised.
After Tre Mason scored on an 8-yard run to make it 45-0 in the fourth quarter, he and Britt raised their hands together.
SLPA Executive Director Jeff Roorda, a controversial figure in the Ferguson drama, said "it is unthinkable that hometown athletes would so publicly perpetuate a narrative that has been disproven over-and-over again" and called on the team and league to discipline the players. (Full statement below.)
 SLPOA Business Manager Jeff Roorda said, "now that the evidence is in and Officer Wilson's account has been verified by physical and ballistic evidence as well as eye-witness testimony, which led the grand jury to conclude that no probable cause existed that Wilson engaged in any wrongdoing, it is unthinkable that hometown athletes would so publicly perpetuate a narrative that has been disproven over-and-over again."
Roorda was incensed that the Rams and the NFL would tolerate such behavior and called it remarkably hypocritical. "All week long, the Rams and the NFL were on the phone with the St. Louis Police Department asking for assurances that the players and the fans would be kept safe from the violent protesters who had rioted, looted, and burned buildings in Ferguson.

Our officers have been working 12 hour shifts for over a week, they had days off including Thanksgiving cancelled so that they could defend this community from those on the streets that perpetuate this myth that Michael Brown was executed by a brother police officer and then, as the players and their fans sit safely in their dome under the watchful protection of hundreds of St. Louis's finest, they take to the turf to call a now-exonerated officer a murderer, that is way out-of-bounds, to put it in football parlance," Roorda said.

this is no more than trying to engage in censorship they want to silence those who are in opposition to their position police innocence, why do all the killer cop supporters get to give there opinion publicly never condemning and always blaming the dead victim bringing up the leaked robbery which by the chiefs own words Wilson knew nothing about.  then Wilson imaging of hulk big Black boogeyman he thought would kill him with the next punch but picture taken right after shows no facial wounds, plus he got to book his own evidence how inept is that, the proverbial "blue wall".

there has to be the shock of the year for nationwide protest against the White cop who until now was a paid vacation and reinstatement for killing Black men.  and you thought there was no change take a look around not possible without the Pres. he said it and it might not be what you envisioned but change non the less recent laws uphold that fact.  one mans evidence is another mans 3 month in the making lie.


Scarborough: Michael Brown Was A 'Thug,' Protests Are Based On 'Lies' (VIDEO)

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/joe-scarborough-michael-brown-thug-ferguson



Co-host Joe Scarborough began by scolding protestors across the nation for making Michael Brown, fatally shot by former Ferguson, Mo. "the face of black oppression."
"The cops have every reason to be pissed off this morning," Scarborough said. He argued thatthe five players on the St. Louis Rams who raised their arms in solidarity with Ferguson on Sunday based their gesture on "lies" that contradicted findings of a grand jury investigation.
The morning show host compared Brown to George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watch volunteer in Florida who shot and killed an unarmed black teenager in 2012, and described both as "thugs."
The show's self-designated liberal panelist and former ad man Donny Deutsch stepped in to register his full agreement with Scarborough.
"I am left of center. You're right of center. You say potato. I say potato," Deutsch began. "And I could not agree with what you said more passionately."
"It's not a black-white situation. It's a thug-police officer situation," said Deustch, beginning to chuckle.

i watched this to ad nauseam i heard him through the years making bigoted borderline racist remarks but sometime he was honest and fair but today was over the hill, he took the republican line of demonizing Michael and excusing the killer cop, he made reference to the robbery which the cops said early on he had no knowledge of he used the murdered kid as a heavy bag he kept pounding while sympathizing with Wilson and his hard job.

i'm waiting for the blow back that should rightfully be aimed directly at him and his radical insensitive assumptive rant.  the Deutch guy came off as usual a suck up to Scarborough what waas more disturbing no one challenged him, is he the clone of O'Reilly?

White Cleveland Cops: We're Treated Too Harshly When We Shoot Black People!


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/white-cleveland-cops-sue-racial-discrimination

Lqvusq7kcoapesagqjgs

The lawsuit, filed Friday in federal district court in Ohio, alleges that one Latino and eight white officers were treated "substantially harsher" than black officers for shooting black residents, according to the Cleveland Plain Dealer.
"A serious dichotomy exists as a result of the defendants' longstanding practices and procedures which place onerous burdens on non-African American officers, including the plaintiffs, because of their race and the race of persons who are the subjects of the legitimate use of deadly force," the lawsuit reads, CNN reported.
All of the officers took part in an incident involving high-speed car chase that took place in November 2012 and ended with the fatal shooting of two black suspects, the newspaper reported. No weapon was ultimately found in the suspects' car, and the city later settled a $3 million lawsuit with their families.

cops sign up and take an oath they know what the job entails they know the racial issues with police and certain demographics, they are suppose to protect not to kill wantonly unarmed people they deem as suspects. they get va salary that they obviously agree to so what the fuss?  if you are a lion tamer and get eaten by a lion again what the fuss?

i would suggest that if not held culpable for the shooting deaths especially of unarmed and later proven innocent of whatever they would ramp up the assaults that would embolden them thinking that the law is in their favor.  like that Ferguson jury was instructed basically that any altercation with a cop is considered an attack on said cop.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/25/1347371/-All-police-shootings-are-assaults-on-law-enforcement-in-Ferguson-grand-jury?detail=email#

Police Order Oath Keepers To Stop Guarding Ferguson Rooftops


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/police-order-oath-keepers-stand-down-ferguson

Dcha4mp9xs8ojbxw3jk9


But St. Louis County police shut down the group's security efforts Saturday, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported. The Oath Keepers' founder, Stewart Rhodes, told the newspaper that volunteers agreed to leave their posts after being threatened with arrest for operating without a license.
The group, made up of current and former law enforcement officials and military who pledge to defend the Constitution, had put out a call last week on its website asking for recruits to head to Ferguson. Rhodes told the Post-Dispatch that the people who volunteered to handle rooftop security there had "intense military, police and EMS training."
Sam Andrews, a former Defense Department contractor who told the New York Times that he's organized private security details for Ferguson businesses in the Oath Keepers' name, said there were "more than five, less than 500" volunteers contributing to the effort.

so guard, police and the klan not enough to protect them from those are under represented, and not treated with equality.  this group oath keepers seem to be only acknowledge the residents who are business owners against those who keep them in business the consumers.

these people on rooftops armed are they just snipers in wait Ferguson power structure puts out the guard, highway patrol, militarized police, civilian mercenary types on rooftops all in anticipation of IMO they thought was a reasonable response to their kangaroo GJ but it sends a message of dominance over citizens whose right to protest was antagonized by the storm trooper presence, that is a statement by the White reigning powers that be of Ferguson to the Black population they feel emboldened to do whatever they want including murder.

that picture above puts you in mind of ISIS just a different flag, or is it?

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2014/08/20/ferguson_police_kill_you_video_gun_pointed_officer_threatens_protestor.html

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/missouri-kkk-lethal-force-ferguson-protesters/

Mark Levin: Officer Darren Wilson "Is Owed An Apology" After Grand Jury Decision In Michael Brown Case


http://mediamatters.org/video/2014/11/25/mark-levin-officer-darren-wilson-is-owed-an-apo/201716

Radio Host Levin: "It's Time For Us To Speak Up In Defense Of Officer Wilson"

it's amazing how we can see the racial divide and it is as it's always has been.  it's also amazing how those who were not there can totally ignore evidence and insert the fabricated and try to pass it off as reality.  praising the prosecutors who deliberately gave outdated info to jurors and the lead guy acting more as Wilson defense attorney than doing his job advocating for justice not a three month in the making script of victim guilt, ignoring his civil rights to not be killed while unarmed.

the chief said Wilson knew nothing of a robbery he was there on another matter but they seem intent on making it a "he recognized him from description of a robbery suspect", while the report said he told them to get out of the street then backed up and attempted to antagonize maybe because they weren't moving fast enough the fact that he backed up suggest he pulled off if Mike was a suspect in a robbery he knew nothing about why did he pull off.

Levin needs to apologize to the country his omission of the truths are the basis of his assumption that the homicidal cop needs to be apologized to, well birds of a feather will lie together

Fox Clings To Benghazi "Stand Down" Hoax After GOP Report Finds No Such Order Was Given

http://mediamatters.org/video/2014/11/24/fox-clings-to-benghazi-stand-down-hoax-after-go/201686
Image result for fox news logo
it's normal for Fox to decry counter evidence debunking their lies but when they do it to their own source you really have to stop and think "is this just obstinate arrogant refusal to admit fault or are they just trying to keep the base in the "we believe you" column?  so it's your choice which is a reliable report or which is the aforementioned garbage.

multiple rebuking of their homespun scandal from day one and now corroboration of their own and still they hold on, reminds me of Romney's lie about Jeep moving to China when debunked he kept on repeating it.  the republicans have given a more definitive meaning to insanity problem just less than half buy in to their misinformation are they too not willing to admit fault as to believing in republican?

Right-Wing Media Defend Maine's EBT Photo ID Requirement To Hype SNAP Fraud Myths

http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/11/25/right-wing-media-defend-maines-ebt-photo-id-req/201713


Right-wing media have championed photo ID requirements on EBT cards for Maine residents who receive food stamp benefits, claiming high levels of waste and fraud. But in reality, Maine's SNAP program is not rampant with fraud and such photo identification measures have proved inefficient in other states.

Maine Implements SNAP Photo ID Requirements


Bangor Daily News
Maine Implements "Rule Requiring Photo Identification On State-Issued Welfare Benefit Cards.

According to a July 30 report from the Bangor Daily News, "nearly all of the roughly 223,000 active EBT cards circulating in Maine" will have to be reissued to include a photo of the recipient on the card. The News noted that "Republican Gov. Paul LePage has been a staunch proponent of the photo ID requirement for EBT cardholders," and he claimed that the policy is needed to deter fraud. [Bangor Daily News, 6/30/14]

Right-Wing Media Use Maine EBT Photo ID Measures To Push Myth Of SNAP FraudFox's Kilmeade: Maine

Is Requiring Photo ID For Food Stamp Benefits Because The State Is "Spending Too Much Money" On "Ineligible People." During the November 25 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, Brian Kilmeade hosted National Review's Jillian Melchior to discuss the state's efforts at "welfare reform." Evidencing the need for the measures by claiming that the state was "spending too much money" on food stamps for "ineligible people," Kilmeade asked "what's the problem here?" Melchoir claimed that public benefits fraud was a "huge problem" and that the photo identification requirement is just "a common sense measure." [Fox News, Fox & Friends, 11/25/14
National Review's Melchior: Gov. LePage's Photo ID Measures Allowed State To "Cut Back On Fraud Abuse." In an October 17 post, National Review's Jillian Melchoir praised Maine Governor Paul LePage's actions, claiming that his EBT photo identification measures have allowed the state to "cut back on fraud abuse" totaling "$3.7 million a year." [National Review Online, 10/17/14]

But SNAP Fraud Remains Low In Maine And Nationwide

Department Of Health And Human Services Official: SNAP Fraud Rate Of Less Than 1 Percent In Maine Is "Likely About The Same" As Rest Of The Country. According to a February 2013 article from the Portland Press Herald, the $3.7 million a year of fraud in the state is "likely about the same" amount of fraud as experienced nationwide, or about 1 percent:

we know the coded buzz with food stamps and any kind of social program the right wing has demonized as a Black thing references like "welfare queens", so therefore it's Black and Hispanics who are defrauding the system or is it?
http://www.indianapolisrecorder.com/news/article_4a27e738-b2b4-11e2-aaef-0019bb2963f4.html

USDA: SNAP Fraud Rates Have "Dropped Dramatically" Over "Last Two Decades." According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the rate of program fraud, or trafficking rates, have "dropped dramatically" over "the last two decades, from about 4 cents on the dollar in 1993, to about 1 cent in 2006-08 (most recent data available)." [U.S. Department of Agriculture, accessed 11/25/14]

Furthermore, EBT Photo ID Programs Have Proved Inefficient In Other States

Tennessee Department Of Human Services: Other States' EBT Photo ID Requirements Have Had High Costs And Little Impact On Fraud.
According to a January report from the Tennessee Department of Human Services which examined, implemented and proposed photo identification requirements for EBT programs, most states saw high associated costs and little impact on fraud. The report noted that states such as New York "determined that photographs on EBT cards did not deter fraud," and in Missouri "mandating photographs on EBT cards did not generate enough savings for the program to be continued." [Tennessee Department Of Human Services, 1/15/14]

now this is a prime example of the quote from G W Bush I keep posting, "you can fool some of the people all of the time and those are the ones you want to concentrate on" those who are the republican base primarily consist of those very gung ho republican do or die types are the very ones that the republicans are stabbing in the back payment for their vote can be fatal especially when you believe their lies.