Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Rubio: Syria situation would be different ‘if I had been in charge’

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/09/04/rubio-syria-situation-would-be-different-if-i-had-been-in-charge/

his party is in charge of the house need i say more?
Article PhotoSen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) offered stern criticism of the Obama administration in an interview with Brett Baier of Fox News saying that if he were president, the situation would be very different now. According to Talking Points Memo, Rubio said that he is skeptical of the efficacy of President Barack Obama’s planned military strikes.
back of his ears still wet, nose running on a ego trip, he would have made it different.
“I don’t believe we should take military action unless we have a clear and achievable goal in mind,” Rubio said. “And one of the clear goals of this action he’s arguing for is to impede Assad from using chemical weapons in the future. I am highly skeptical. 
Now we have a closed hearing tomorrow where classified information will be discussed, and I’ll wait until then to reserve judgment. But I remain very skeptical that the kind of attack they’re contemplating, this limited attack, is going to actually achieve that goal of preventing Assad from using chemical weapons in the future.”
He also said that if he were commander in chief, the situation would never have gone this long without some form of U.S. action.
delusions of grandeur are still delusions he now proposes to tell us not only what he would have done but someone unnamed also would do what he would do, just not specifics you know like the campaign 2012, maybe he will tell us his plan and someone else's after the election, again still waiting on the first one.  yes it's as insane as it sounds but it's ok he's republican.
And part of that equation, I can’t tell you right now until we go through that intelligence briefing tomorrow because one of the key questions we have to ask ourselves is, ‘Who are these so-called moderates on the ground in Syria and are they even capable of taking control of the country and giving us a rational, secular, stable government?’ That’s a key question.”
wait, wait hold up "giving us a secular and rational , stable gov't", he just made this about him and the rest of the selfish lugnuts what about the people of Syria and what they want, they see republican politics all over the media i'm sure they want no part of it because over half of American does not want it