More ink was spilled dissenting today’s Supreme Court marriage equality decision than the majority’s opinion required. There were four different dissents, one by Chief Justice John Roberts (joined by Justices Scalia and Thomas), plus separate dissents from Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito.
The opinions are rife with criticism for the majority, including claims that they have upended the reputation of the Court, paranoia about the consequences for religious objectors, and a rejection of the idea that the benefits of marriage even constitute a liberty. Here’s a look at some of the most hysterical reactions from the dissenting justices.what i'm walking away with is these 4 justices are using their own personal right wing ideas to form opinion that is suppose to just be an interpretation of law not what they view as intolerant and biased to one party against the peoples best interest. the best reason for no more lifetime appointments for anyone involved in making decisions that impact American lives one way or the other, those people should be subject to election like politicians not biased appointing.
the words above the scotus entrance "EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW " some decisions don't reflect that sentiment that is a negative to it's intent and our last resort for that equal justice that often ends with just us. those 19 hysterical's are in the article really make the case for change in the high court.
