Friday, November 28, 2014

All police shootings are "assaults on law enforcement" in Ferguson grand jury


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/11/25/1347371/-All-police-shootings-are-assaults-on-law-enforcement-in-Ferguson-grand-jury?detail=email#
woman paused to talk to us. She told us the police were shooting ...
I'm reviewing the grand jury transcripts released last night, and they are simply amazing. Here's my favorite exchange so far to illustrate the deeply embedded biases that exist in our culture when examining police violence. This is from the testimony of the medical examiner, pp. 43-44:
Q: Were you told when you initially arrived at the scene that there was some type of altercation involving an officer and the deceased?
A: Yes, ma'am.
Q: And that was described as an assault?
A: Correct.
Q: So when you began this investigation, you were characterizing this as an assault of a law enforcement officer, correct?
A: Yes.
Q: Is that in any way meant to be your opinion of what happened or who was a victim in this case?
A: No, ma'am. Any time I'm involved in an officer involved shooting, be it a fatal one or non-fatal, it is always during my initial investigation listed as an assault on law enforcement.
Q: And so on various evidence items that you package on these sheets, you list a victim name?
A: Correct.
Q: And when you began this investigation, who was your victim name on these packages?
A: Officer Wilson.

does this sound more like "the dead Black guy assaulted the live officer with no bruises on his face as he described from the attack"?  so in Ferguson cops can stop, have you assume the position than shoot you while you were up against a wall legs spread and hands up and the poor officer is the one who is not the perpetrator. does that dynamic include White alleged too?
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/08/police-shootings-ferguson-race-data
The investigators automatically presume that if a police officer shoots someone, no matter what the circumstances or evidence, it is an "assault on law enforcement."
But hey... that doesn't mean they start with an opinion about it. This was a totally unbiased investigation. They all are.

so as usual the deck is stacked and instead of justice we end up as usual with just us, it's alive and it's hunting Black males and the community is complicit common sense would tell reasonable people something is radically wrong here others would accept the assumption and exonerate the village murderer.