is that none of them ever will be, or could ever have been, directly impacted by their "narrowly tailored" ruling against women:
Meanwhile, three of the four justices who ruled against the majority's decision know that "narrowly tailored" doesn't mean the same thing as "won't affect me."
But hey, who cares about women and their rights when the religious liberty of a nationwide chain of arts and crafts stores is at stake?
is there anyone who doesn't see the intent by right wing is to control women's well being or in their cases non well being, remember Issa and the contraception farce that to was glaring without womens presence or input but theses guys are deciding for them based on nothing else other than they were White and republican.
there can be impeachment of scotus members but as long as their cohorts control the house ain't happening.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_US_Supreme_Court_justice_be_impeached_and_removed_from_office
