http://www.salon.com/2014/02/03/angry_rights_secret_revulsion_why_they_really_dodge_minimum_wage_questions/
It’s no great secret that Republicans oppose increasing the minimum wage. They don’t pretend it’s something they want to do under any circumstances. They don’t even really bother disguising their opposition.They cloak their view in dated and oversimplified economic arguments about labor demand and economic growth when the real impediment is ideological, and so it’s a somewhat better kept secret that many Republicans oppose the minimum wage altogether.Opposing the minimum wage isn’t a politically seemly thing to do, though, and thus the great political consequence of President Obama’s decision, announced during his State of the Union address, to institute a $10.10 minimum wage for future federal contracts, will be to draw the extent of this opposition out into the open.If there’s one thing conservatives agree upon with respect to Obama’s executive order, it’s that it won’t impact very many people. They’re actually probably correct about that. Yet despite the policy’s marginal impact, some conservatives abruptly turned discovering the means of denying a higher wage to a tiny number of workers into a top priority.In the days since Obama’s State of the Union address, they’ve attacked the order itself, encouraged Congress to block it, and scoured federal law for a reason that the courts should throw it out.
i think it matters not how many but that some are payed fair wage, the only reason he can't do it nationwide is because as the article states and as they themselves have stated they don't want to raise wage, because of the same lie it hurts business, what about it hurts "we the people" who are more than the businesses so by their logic they should not be concerned because the businesses are a smaller group.
Irrespective of legal questions, the smart political play for Republicans is to let Obama have this one. Assume the order’s validity, note that it’s a fairly marginal change, and then move on. Don’t turn it into an ideological lightning rod.House Speaker John Boehner understands this, which is why his reaction to the minimum wage order was fairly subdued.“I think dealing with federal contracts and the minimum wage, he probably has the authority to do that. But we’re going to watch very closely because there’s a Constitution we all take an oath to — including him — and following that Constitution is the basis for our republic, and we shouldn’t put that in jeopardy,” he told reporters last week.“Let’s understand something: This affects not one current contract,” Boehner said. “It only affects future contracts with the federal government. And so I think the question, Mr. President, is how many people will this executive action actually help? I suspect the answer is somewhere close to zero.”
for someone who seems to know constitution why do they walk all ove it and point at the Pres. as a potential violator aside from the violations they already accused him of, someone needs to take a tally and see who is the real perpetrator here. most egregious voter blocking denying Americans the right to vote only so their guy can get more votes like gerrymandering.
remember we voted them out of the house by over a million votes but they are still there gerrymandering denying those million plus voters the right to have their votes counted.
