On Monday, the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in a case that will decide if recipients of government aid can be forced to oppose prostitution – or potentially any other issue as a contingency of receiving U.S. funds. The case, Alliance for Open Society International v United States Agency for International Development, arises from a controversial policy governing AIDS education, prevention, and treatment, a decade-long fight that's crossed political lines and was kicked off by Rep. Chris Smith as part of a larger conservative attempt to undermine reproductive and sexual health care. With HIV and AIDS projects facing closure if they don't adopt the government's position on sex work, it's sex workers who are paying the ultimate price.From the onset of the global AIDS epidemic, sex workers have been scapegoated for the spread of HIV – sometimes even by those who claim to help them. Around the globe, AIDS provided an excuse to close red light districts and step up enforcement of anti-prostitution laws. In one early example, in 1988, California considered a bill to forcibly test all people arrested for prostitution-related charges for HIV. If positive, they could face felony charges. Fears, myths, and stigma – fueled by a lack of HIV education and a refusal among policymakers to consider the reality of the epidemic – have historically made sex workers, along with gay and bisexual men and injection-drug users, an easy target.
i emember Gays being the carriers of death as described by the right wing.
won't that throw a damper on republican get a ways and conventions and jst plain ol get togethers?
Now, over thirty years into the epidemic, with that much more evidence available on the social and structural factors that drive HIV, policy still lags life-threateningly behind. One such policy is embedded in what's regarded as the United States' cornerstone AIDS policy,
PEPFAR (the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief). Passed into law in 2003 under President George W. Bush, PEPFAR has moved approximately $46 billion to programs working to prevent and treat HIV. But if your HIV program supports sex workers? You could find yourself denied funding and your doors shut.PEPFAR contains what's been termed the anti-prostitution pledge, which forbids organizations who receive PEPFAR funding from "promoting" or "advocating" for "the legalization or practice of prostitution," and requires organizations to adopt a policy "explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking." In some ways,the pledge resembles the now-repealed Mexico City Policy, or global gag rule, which forbade non-governmental organizations who received U.S. funds from using even entirely separate funds to provide or refer to abortion services. Like the global gag rule, the pledge requirement limits not just what recipients can do with their PEPFAR funds, but with all their funds.
is this really helping the right wing rider attachments that "give you a crust of bread and such, you can help yourself, bt don't take too much" God Bless the child lyrics
they claim the cost of humanity at x amount of dollars then leave out the savings of the restrictions they hate so much "because they interfer with our freedoms" because it significant reducs actual spending plus what ver they can skim.
so who gets the most help those in need or those of greed?
